Tradução e análise de palavras por inteligência artificial ChatGPT
Nesta página você pode obter uma análise detalhada de uma palavra ou frase, produzida usando a melhor tecnologia de inteligência artificial até o momento:
- como a palavra é usada
- frequência de uso
- é usado com mais frequência na fala oral ou escrita
- opções de tradução de palavras
- exemplos de uso (várias frases com tradução)
- etimologia
Hall v Geiger-Jones, Co - tradução para russo
.jpg?width=200 "Early Geiger–Müller tube made in 1932 by Hans Geiger for laboratory use")
![A Radhound Geiger counter measuring radiation emitted by a tree in [[Chernobyl]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Geiger counter measuring tree at Chernobyl.jpg?width=200 "A Radhound Geiger counter measuring radiation emitted by a tree in [[Chernobyl]]")
![G-M pancake detector (right) feeding a microcontroller data-logger (left) sending data to a PC via [[bluetooth]]. A radioactive rock was placed on the detector causing the graph (in background) to rise.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/RM-80 GM with LCD-90 Micro Controller and Wireless Bluetooth.jpg?width=200 "G-M pancake detector (right) feeding a microcontroller data-logger (left) sending data to a PC via [[bluetooth]]. A radioactive rock was placed on the detector causing the graph (in background) to rise.")
![G-M counters being used in the search for debris of satellite [[Kosmos 954]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Cosmos 954 - Recovery 001.jpg?width=200 "G-M counters being used in the search for debris of satellite [[Kosmos 954]]")
['gaigəkauntə]
общая лексика
счетчик Гейгера
физика
счётчик Гейгера
машиностроение
счетчик Гейгера-Мюллера
трубка счетная Гейгера-Мюллера
существительное
физика
счетчик Гейгера
общая лексика
счетчик Гейгера - Мюллера
медицина
счётчик Гейгера-Мюллера
Definição
Wikipédia
Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick was an Internet defamation case heard in the High Court of Australia, decided on 10 December 2002. The 28 October 2000 edition of Barron's Online, published by Dow Jones, contained an article entitled "Unholy Gains" in which several references were made to the respondent, Joseph Gutnick. Gutnick contended that part of the article defamed him. A key judgement was that the suit could be brought in Australia.
